[rfc-i] V3 vocabulary and BCP 14 language

Adam Roach adam at nostrum.com
Tue Aug 20 18:19:55 PDT 2019


Speaking personally, I think the answer is "yes" -- if these keywords 
are rendered differently in the document, then I think their definition 
needs to be rendered in the same way as they will appear. It is for this 
reason, for example, that they appear in all-caps in the template.

/a

On 8/20/19 7:52 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> I think this is a question for the RFC Editor to look at and rule on.
>
> When one places the BCP 14 template text into a document, are the BCP 14
> keywords supposed to be wrapped in the bcp14 element from the xml2rfc
> vocabulary or not?  I can see arguments on both sides of this so I don't
> think that I have a personal opinion.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest




More information about the rfc-interest mailing list