[rfc-i] Where to put a notice saying where a draft should be discussed?

Phillip Hallam-Baker phill at hallambaker.com
Tue Aug 13 11:38:12 PDT 2019


Thanks, I will follow your example.

I would suggest that this become a codified practice though!


On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 2:33 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo at tzi.org> wrote:

> Many drafts have something like a Note to Readers right after the abstract.
> For an example, see: draft-ietf-quic-transport-22.txt
> (This discusses both the WG and the Github presence.)
>
> I have reproduced the way this was input in kramdown-rfc below; if you
> don’t use that, you can find the XML in the usual place.
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> […]
> --- abstract
>
> This document defines the core of the QUIC transport protocol.
> Accompanying
> documents describe QUIC's loss detection and congestion control and the
> use of
> TLS for key negotiation.
>
>
> --- note_Note_to_Readers
>
> Discussion of this draft takes place on the QUIC working group mailing list
> (quic at ietf.org), which is archived at
> \<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=quic\>.
>
> Working Group information can be found at \<https://github.com/quicwg\>;
> source
> code and issues list for this draft can be found at
> \<https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/labels/-transport\>.
>
> --- middle
>
> # Introduction
> […]
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20190813/bf735c78/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list