[rfc-i] Bug in RFC Search page...

Toerless Eckert tte+ietf at cs.fau.de
Tue Sep 26 13:41:42 PDT 2017


What terminology do you propose

ASCII text -> plain-text
UTF-8 text -> plain-text unicode
HTML ASCII -> HTML
HTML UTF-8 -> HTML unicode
...

?

(as a reminder because i didn't get any response, i would love to see an RFC header
 field indicating the format of the document... ;-)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:33:29PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 21:30, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/search/rfc_search_detail.php?rfc=8187&pubstatus%5B%5D=Any&pub_date_type=any
> > 
> > This returns a result mentioning an "ASCII" version of the RFC. There is no ASCII
> > version of RFC 8187.
> 
> I think we just need to stop calling plain-text ASCII.
> 
> (Note that the HTML versions of many documents are ASCII.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list