[rfc-i] RFC 7991 ol at type

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Sep 7 23:11:09 PDT 2017


On 2017-09-08 08:07, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2017, at 07:41, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> If I specify type="a", is this equivalent to type="%c" or type="%c." ?
>>
>> The text would imply the former, but the latter is clearly preferable.
>> _______________________________________________
> 
> "the meaning is the same as it is for HTML:”
> 
> So I was reading this as “%c.”, not “%c”.
> 
> Could be clearer…
> ...

<https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/grouping-content.html#attr-ol-type>

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list