[rfc-i] some thoughts about errata
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Mar 20 02:10:14 PDT 2017
On 2017-02-12 12:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2017-02-08 16:26, John Levine wrote:
>>>>> 2) For each RFC, there should be a machine-readable (*) HTTP resource
>>>>> (**) offering status information about the set of erratas present for
>>>>> that RFC.
>> That's not much harder. Agaim we already have this:
>> The current result is formatted to look nice in a browser, but since
>> it's all generated on the fly from a database, a cleaner URL that
>> returned the result in XML or JSON would be straightforward.
> In the meantime I put something together to scrape data from these pages
> and used it (optionally) in rfc2629.xslt.
Now slightly refined and documented here:
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest