[rfc-i] Where can I find a draft of the proposed stylesheet?

Phillip Hallam-Baker phill at hallambaker.com
Mon Jun 26 19:20:58 PDT 2017


Ignore the thing about the absolute URLs. For some reason Chrome decided to
normalize everything when it saved the doc, agg!

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill at hallambaker.com
> wrote:

> Thanks.
>
> I am working on getting it in sync with my tools.
>
> One thing I think we probably should have in the final style is the IETF
> logo if it is an RFC and a watermark saying DRAFT for IDs. That can be done
> through the script though.
>
> Internet draft should be distinguished in machine readable manner:
>
> <html class="ID"> for draft ???
>
> The navigation anchors seem wrong to me. The fragment identifiers refer to
> the current document by default. These have hardcoded links to a particular
> version. That will make reading documents offline a pain. It would also
> cause all the docs to break if the RFC editor reorganizes the Web site.
>
>       <a class="selfRef" href="https://rfc-format.
> github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/sample3-v2.html#n-status-of-this-memo">
>
> Should be:
>
>       <a class="selfRef" href="#n-status-of-this-memo">
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-06-26 20:58, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>>
>>> I am just redoing my Word/Markdown/XML to RFC tool and would like to
>>> revamp the HTML output.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have a link or a copy of the proposed IETF stylesheet? It
>>> doesn't have to be final, just want to get the right class etc. attributes
>>> output and get an idea of what the end result looks like.
>>>
>>
>> <https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/>, I think...
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20170626/97d5ce7e/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list