[rfc-i] xml2rfc schema for draft version

Martin Thomson martin.thomson at gmail.com
Thu Jul 13 23:13:24 PDT 2017


On 14 July 2017 at 00:22, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill at hallambaker.com> wrote:
> [...] I can't be
> bothered to track version numbers. Updating them is a chore, I always have
> to check to see whether I did it. That is something that must be done by a
> machine, not the user.

I have no problem with status quo.  Think of the entire name as a
version identifier.  That you need a new name each time you submit is
a feature.  (I have tooling that manages a default value for the new
name, it's not that difficult.)


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list