[rfc-i] Two drafts showing the advantage of the new format

Adam Roach adam at nostrum.com
Wed Aug 16 17:47:44 PDT 2017


On 8/16/17 7:30 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On 16 Aug 2017, at 17:22, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Adam Roach <adam at nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> The diagrams in the new format will not allow colors. You're going 
>>> to want
>>> to use some other mechanism to indicate what you are currently 
>>> intending
>>> color to mean.
>>>
>> Perhaps we should let IETF participants see and decide for themselves?
>
> The IETF did that during the various discussions on draft-iab-svg-rfc, 
> which became RFC 7996. 


Well, to be clear, it was established earlier than that; cf. 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6949#section-3.2>, list item 8. This is 
some pretty long-running consensus.

/a

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20170816/ec85c02a/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list