[rfc-i] Sooo has anyone tried actually printing the new HTML style??

Phillip Hallam-Baker phill at hallambaker.com
Thu Aug 10 21:13:48 PDT 2017


I was having issues on Chrome and Edge. Commenting out these lines did the
trick.

  body {
    font-family: 'Noto Serif', "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    width: 100%;
  }


On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Worked for me.  Firefox on Windows.  I can produce a PDF, though it's
> a tad large.
>
> On 11 August 2017 at 12:54, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill at hallambaker.com>
> wrote:
> > I just completed my draft for the naming workshop. Seems to work fine on
> the
> > screen but when I print... white text on white... argh!!!
> >
> > I am using the stylesheet from this with very minor tweakage:
> > https://rfc-format.github.io/draft-iab-rfc-css-bis/
> >
> >
> > Anyone skilled in stylesheetery?
> >
> > Example attached. This was produced from a Word document source. The next
> > step being to generate xml2rfcv2 and v3 output, then markdown.
> >
> > I believe that the tool should work correctly with markdown or xml2rfc v3
> > input.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rfc-interest mailing list
> > rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20170811/5978acc4/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list