[rfc-i] draft-iab-xml2rfc-03, "B.2.1 Overlapping Values"

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue Mar 15 14:44:58 PDT 2016

On 3/14/16, 3:55 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Julian Reschke" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:

>""pn" for all elements not listed above always has the format 
>"p-nnn-mmm", where "nnn" is the section number and "mmm" is the relative 
>position in the section. For example, this would be "p-2.1.3-7" for the 
>seventh part number in Section 2.1.3."
>I believe we need to enumerate which elements are numbered. For 
>instance, <iref> is not, right?

Correct.  The editor's version of the preptool draft currently says:

Add “pn” attributes for all parts. Parts are:
* <section>: pn=’s-1.4.2’
* <references>: pn=’s-12’ or pn=’s-12.1’
* <abstract>: pn=’s-abstract’
* <note>: pn=’s-note-2’
* <boilerplate>: pn=’s-boilerplate’
* <table>: pn=’t-3’
* <figure>: pn=’f-4’
* <artwork>, <aside>, <blockquote>, <dl>, <dt>, <li>, <ol>, <sourcecode>, <t>, <ul>: pn=’p-[section]-[counter]’

(which needs to be fixed for boilerplate still)

I'm not currently doing <dt>; should those start at one higher than their parent <dl>, or should we remove it from the list?

Joe Hildebrand

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list