[rfc-i] section/@numbered feedback

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at greenbytes.de
Sun Mar 6 22:54:39 PST 2016

On 2016-03-06 23:57, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> Now I’m confused: XML2RFCv2 has had section/@numbered since 2015-02-22.
> It doesn’t appear to be documented in RFC 7749.

RFC 7749 documents the vocabulary at the time the RFC redesign project 
started, not later (experimental) additions.

> It is needed to do RFC 7322 style acknowledgements, so I have been
> recommending its use to kramdown-rfc users.
> Is this
> [_] a bug in RFC 7749
> [_] a feature of XML2RFCv2 that is just anticipating XML2RFCv3

Partly. It uses incompatible values, see 

> [_] a feature of XML2RFCv2 I should stop recommending

Yes, for now, because of the ticket above.

> [_] all just my confusion
> Multiple answers may be valid…
> (There is also reference/@quote-title…)
> Grüße, Carsten

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list