[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>"
julian.reschke at greenbytes.de
Tue Mar 1 10:19:19 PST 2016
On 2016-03-01 19:08, Robert Sparks wrote:
> I read Julian's suggestion to be <em class="bcp14">
> Julian is that what you meant?
Right (that's what rfc2629.xslt does). Of course if there's a
requirement that these terms will *not* be visually different unless
enabled by a specific user-provided CSS then using <em> makes it bit
harder to achieve that (we'd need a CSS class that undoes whatever
default CSS comes for <em>).
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest