[rfc-i] [IAB] draft-iab-html-rfc-02, "9.9 <bcp14>"

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at greenbytes.de
Tue Mar 1 10:19:19 PST 2016


On 2016-03-01 19:08, Robert Sparks wrote:
> ...
> I read Julian's suggestion to be <em class="bcp14">
> Julian is that what you meant?
> ...

Right (that's what rfc2629.xslt does).  Of course if there's a 
requirement that these terms will *not* be visually different unless 
enabled by a specific user-provided CSS then using <em> makes it bit 
harder to achieve that (we'd need a CSS class that undoes whatever 
default CSS comes for <em>).

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list