[rfc-i] streams in rfc-index

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 10:48:48 PST 2015

> there is the question of what Area to use for this type of document that the IESG approved but was not the
> product of a working group (there are quite a few documents that fall into this category) - maybe (Stream: IETF, Area: Independent)

That doesn't seem quite right. Surely those documents do clearly belong to an area,
according to the sponsoring AD? 2119 would be General for example.

If we don't know the area, "Independent" would be a bit confusing - I would
suggest "General" as a default.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list