[rfc-i] Updating one paragraph of RFC 2026 to reflect current practice

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri May 29 13:53:55 PDT 2015

On 30/05/2015 03:09, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I mostly agree with this change, and feel that it shouldn't be that
> contentious.

IETF practice violates RFC 2026 almost every day, on more serious matters,
and we seem to be collectively happy with that. So personally I'd let
this one slide. But then, I lost skin trying to fix the more egregious
issues while I was General AD, so I'm biased.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list