Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue May 5 06:40:46 PDT 2015
On 5/5/15, 2:13 PM, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> That was likely added before the structured contents. Since we didn't know what the semantics of annotation were, we didn't know if an ascii equivalent was needed. As things currently stand, it can be removed.
>FWIW, <annotation> with structured content has been around for many
>years. It's a v2 feature, after all...
<refcontent> has the same issue.
More information about the rfc-interest