[rfc-i] suggestion for the RPC
tony at att.com
Sat Jul 18 08:33:22 PDT 2015
On 7/18/15 11:14 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hello Heather and Friends,
> As suggested by Tony, I'm starting a new thread on a suggestion I had
> elsewhere. Tony stated it better so I'm just quoting him now:
>> Are you suggesting that they add references after the fact for ones
>> that have been used in published RFCs and are not currently present?
>> That's not something that they currently do and would be a nice addition.
> Yes, this is what I'm suggesting. I don't know if the RPC checks
> external references, but if they do take this suggestion, then I'd
> suggest that some check be made to ensure that the reference is in fact
> correct. Would that be big buckeroos?
Note: this is for references that do not have an entry already in
bibxml2 (the "misc" bibxml tree), in particular, currently-unsupported
More information about the rfc-interest