[rfc-i] Proposed change to RFC references
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Tue Aug 18 12:27:51 PDT 2015
On 8/17/15, 1:27 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Viktor Dukhovni" <rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org on behalf of ietf-dane at dukhovni.org> wrote:
>I find the RFCs much more usable in their HTML form at
>than in the text and PDF forms linked at the rfc-editor site.
>Is there any chance that the RFC editor page will make HTML RFCs
>available? [via https of course]
No. However, there is a chance that the version you get from the RFC Editor site may one day be more easy to use, and that we might not always need to tools site in the future.
>Otherwise, I'm afraid I don't much care what protocol is used to
>deliver documents via URLs I won't use. :-(
I'll take that as a vote for: "that wouldn't bother me, please proceed."
More information about the rfc-interest