[rfc-i] Digital Preservation Considerations for the RFC Series -- draft-flanagan-rfc-preservation-00.txt is posted
Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed Sep 10 13:57:18 PDT 2014
The first few of these were amusing. However, if you guys could perhaps
get back onto the actual topic, that would be even more amusing at this
On 9/10/14, 8:35 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
>On 11/09/2014 01:11, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> On 9/10/14 7:41 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>>> No, not punch cards! Anything but those!
>> You don't want to archive RFCs on punched cards?
>> That would be great! :-)
>We'd have to stick to the 72 column limit, though, to allow
>space for the sequence numbers in case somebody drops the deck.
>(I never knew there was an off switch on an 029 punch. I thought
>they were an always-on device.)
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest