[rfc-i] Digital Preservation Considerations for the RFC Series -- draft-flanagan-rfc-preservation-00.txt is posted

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Wed Sep 10 13:57:18 PDT 2014


The first few of these were amusing.  However, if you guys could perhaps 
get back onto the actual topic, that would be even more amusing at this 
point.


On 9/10/14, 8:35 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> 
wrote:

>On 11/09/2014 01:11, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>> On 9/10/14 7:41 AM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>> 
>>> No, not punch cards!  Anything but those!
>> 
>> You don't want to archive RFCs on punched cards?
>> That would be great! :-)
>
>We'd have to stick to the 72 column limit, though, to allow
>space for the sequence numbers in case somebody drops the deck.
>
>(I never knew there was an off switch on an 029 punch. I thought
>they were an always-on device.)
>
>   Brian
>_______________________________________________
>rfc-interest mailing list
>rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
>https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
>


-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the rfc-interest mailing list