[rfc-i] Titles for divided reference sections in non-standards track documents
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri May 30 18:01:18 PDT 2014
On 31/05/2014 12:53, Ted Lemon wrote:
> On May 30, 2014, at 6:48 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh at joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, not seeing the problem,
doesn't say anything about standards track RFCs or BCPs,
or about essential dependency for implementation.
I think an outsider who assumes the dictionary meaning of "normative"
will not be greatly misled. (We could perfectly well have called
them "Essential References", but we didn't.)
More information about the rfc-interest