[rfc-i] Titles for divided reference sections in non-standards track documents
elwynd at folly.org.uk
Fri May 30 15:39:36 PDT 2014
A large proportion of informational documents do not describe protocols. As I said some do and normative would be appropriate there.
Sent from my ASUS Pad
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>On 2014-05-30 23:00, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>> Seriously? Well, it's misleading because it has a different meaning. Its good to have precision.
>I disagree that it has a different meaning. Informative and Experimental
>RFCs still describe protocols, even if we don't call them "IETF
>standards". These protocols have normative parts, no?
>> We got normative by default after we stopped requiring undivided references in informational documents.
>Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest