[rfc-i] Titles for divided reference sections in non-standards track documents

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri May 30 14:29:01 PDT 2014

On 2014-05-30 23:00, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Seriously?  Well, it's misleading because it has a different meaning.  Its good to have precision.

I disagree that it has a different meaning. Informative and Experimental 
RFCs still describe protocols, even if we don't call them "IETF 
standards". These protocols have normative parts, no?

> We got normative by default after we stopped requiring undivided references in informational documents.
> /Elwyn

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list