[rfc-i] Titles for divided reference sections in non-standards track documents
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Fri May 30 14:29:01 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-30 23:00, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Seriously? Well, it's misleading because it has a different meaning. Its good to have precision.
I disagree that it has a different meaning. Informative and Experimental
RFCs still describe protocols, even if we don't call them "IETF
standards". These protocols have normative parts, no?
> We got normative by default after we stopped requiring undivided references in informational documents.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest