nico at cryptonector.com
Thu May 22 13:04:39 PDT 2014
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> On May 22, 2014, at 10:58 AM, Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> We do not have control over the resporce.org domain, so this can become a long term problem. Since we are updating these specifications, can we replace xml.resource.org with something at ietf.org or rfc-editor.org?
> Neither the v2 or v3 spec even talk about xml.resource.org. The v3 spec describes a way for authors to get relevant references directly through the draft processing tool. That assumes that databases used for creating references will be hosted by the IETF and/or RFC Editor.
draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-08 does? In what section? Appendix B.1 does
refer to xml.resource.org.
More information about the rfc-interest