[rfc-i] Looking for design assistance with the HTML publication format

Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Fri May 16 13:00:28 PDT 2014


On 16/05/2014 18:20, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-05-16 03:28, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 16/05/2014 10:21, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
>>> On 5/15/14, 12:28 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>>> Heather,
>>>>
>>>> I'm not going to volunteer for this because I'm not qualified.
>>>>
>>>> But I have a question:
>>>>
>>>> I think there are currently *two* HTLM formats:
>>>> - the HTML output from xml2rfc
>>
>> Note that there are some differences between the HTML
>> outputs from v1 and v2.
> 
> Please don't confuse formats (v1 and v2) with processors (xml2rfc.tcl,
> rfc2629.xslt, the new python processor). The latter differ in output,
> irrespective of the input format.

Oops, sorry. However, it doesn't change the practical effect for
the current conversation: there are in fact (at least) 3 variants
of existing HTML format around, and looking at their pros and cons
seems useful.

  Brian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list