[rfc-i] Comments in the canonical RFCs

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Sat May 10 15:56:33 PDT 2014


On 5/9/14, 6:48 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 10/05/2014 04:18, Nico Williams wrote:
>> Any comments in the canonical XML should not relate to whatever is
>> being specified.  That leaves very little to comment about, mostly
>> xml2rfc-related matters:
>> 
>> <!-- the following is a hackish way to get this table to look right! -->
>
>I agree. Comments on the content are inappropriate, but comments
>on the production process may have value. I don't think a blanket
>removal is a good idea.

That's not possible to automate.  I don't want to add manual editorial
process.  Either we should allow comments in the published version or
disallow them.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the rfc-interest mailing list