[rfc-i] Comments in the canonical RFCs

Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) jhildebr at cisco.com
Sat May 10 15:55:39 PDT 2014


On 5/9/14, 3:26 PM, "Paul Kyzivat" <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

>On 5/9/14 2:34 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote:
>> +1.  We probably want to retain the last edited copy of the XML separate
>> from the published canonical version for other reasons (e.g. expanding
>> TOC), and I don't mind that copy having all the comments left in.  When
>> you go to -bis that document, you can start from the last-edited
>>version,
>> rather than the canonical one.
>
>When you say "last edited" one, do you mean the last version from the
>WG? Or the last edit done by the editor?
>
>If you mean the last one done by the editor, then that would be an ok
>one to use as basis for bis. Otherwise not.

I mean the last one edited by the editor.  It SHOULD be the same as the
published version except for whatever expansion and deletion (such as
comments) happens in the final step, all of which are mechanical.

-- 
Joe Hildebrand





More information about the rfc-interest mailing list