[rfc-i] Comments in the canonical RFCs

Donald Eastlake d3e3e3 at gmail.com
Fri May 9 11:08:07 PDT 2014

I support removal of comments before publication. Hidden potential
junk is something we don't want.

 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA
 d3e3e3 at gmail.com

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dave Thaler <dthaler at microsoft.com> wrote:
>> <!-- The following boilerplate comes from <insert url here>. -->
>> I don't know if there's enough value in keeping such comments to make the
>> RFC editing process take on the job of worrying about which type a comment is.
> Making them remove such comments might be problematic, and they might
> forget.  Unless we have tools that know how to remove such comments.
> (Huh, do XML processors have options to strip out comments?)  And if
> we don't have such tools then we'll need to have XML submissions'
> source reviewed!
> Therefore that is my concern here: the need to either have XML
> comments automatically removed or reviewed.  I prefer the former, and
> that makes the matter moot.
> Nico
> --
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list