[rfc-i] rfc/@docName vs rfc/@number, was: Determining output type in v3
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 8 11:00:24 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-08 19:48, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 8, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Such as
>> <link rel="prev" target="urn:ietf:id:draft-private-whatever-01"/>
> If we are going to use RFC 5988, we should actually stick to its semantics instead of making up our own.
> o Relation Name: prev
> o Description: Refers to the previous resource in an ordered series
> of resources. Synonym for "previous".
> o Reference: [W3C.REC-html401-19991224]
> The Internet-Draft and the RFC are not part of a "ordered series of resources".
I would argue that the sequence of Internet Drafts indeed form an
ordered series; but of course we could define a more specific relation
if we really need that.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest