[rfc-i] Content models for <li> and <dd>

Paul Hoffman paul.hoffman at vpnc.org
Thu May 8 10:37:58 PDT 2014


On May 8, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Sections 2.18 and 2.32 both have similar and very complex content models. (I didn't compare to see if they are actually identical.) And a fairly long subset is also shared with several other content models.
> 
> IMO it would be better if such reused content models were defined once and referenced. That way people don't need to treat them as things that need to be learned separately.

This appeals to me. But so does keeping the <dt> / <dd> pairing from HTML. I could see that <dl> could take <dt> / <li> pairs.

Thoughts?

--Paul Hoffman


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list