[rfc-i] rfc/@docName vs rfc/@number, was: Determining output type in v3

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 8 09:33:58 PDT 2014


On 2014-05-08 18:26, Nico Williams wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 2014-05-08 18:19, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> I would like the draft name to be preserved after the document becomes
>>> an RFC. For those who work on a document for a long time it is the name
>>> that is remembered, and ought to remain available.
>>> ...
>>
>>
>> That information is available from the RFC database already...
>
> But it'd be nice if things like "this WG work item I-D replaces an
> individual submission I-D" could be expressed in the I-D XML.  I think
> more metadata like this in the XML would be handy.  I agree there's an
> alternate source for it at this time, so it's hardly urgent.
>
> Nico

Such as

	<link rel="prev" target="urn:ietf:id:draft-private-whatever-01"/>

?

Best regards, Julian


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list