[rfc-i] autogeneratedISSN in v3

Julian Reschke julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 8 08:55:51 PDT 2014

On 2014-05-08 17:43, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On May 8, 2014, at 8:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
>> I disagree that something needs to be in the canonical version if it has a constant default value.
> We don't disagree about that; we disagree that the ISSN is a constant value.

It has a constant default value now; if we ever need another ISSN it 
wouldn't be the "default value".

>> The XML format can contain
>>   <yourFavoriteElementName href="urn:issn:2070-1721"/>
>> and the processor can find and convert it to:
>>   ISSN: 2070-1721
> Yep, that would work as well.
> --Paul Hoffman

Best regards, Julian

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list