[rfc-i] Private documents [was Alternatives to 'deprecated' in xml2rfc v3]

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Wed May 7 10:12:32 PDT 2014

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman at vpnc.org> wrote:
> On May 7, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com> wrote:

>> [...]  If you want standard boilerplate you say which (or if
>> <boilerplate> is absent you get the most common choice).  [...]
> The expected usage almost all the time is that the "standard" attribute is going to be the same for <front> and <back>. Your proposal seems like adding verbosity for an extreme edge case (the boilerplate setting will be different in <front> and <back>).

If not present then you'd get the standard boilerplate.  I.e., most
users would never have to add <boilerplate standard=.../> to their


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list