[rfc-i] Alternatives to 'deprecated' in xml2rfc v3
dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue May 6 20:50:24 PDT 2014
On 5/6/2014 9:14 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> A section title along the lines of "Additional vocabulary supported for
> input" accurately and neutrally describes this set of vocabulary.
Further thought, if the above language is too neutral, given the group's
predilection for denigrating the retained vocabulary:
Legacy vocabulary supported for input
That makes its purpose for backward compatibility explicit.
More information about the rfc-interest