[rfc-i] Alternatives to 'deprecated' in xml2rfc v3

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Tue May 6 20:50:24 PDT 2014

On 5/6/2014 9:14 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> A section title along the lines of "Additional vocabulary supported for
> input" accurately and neutrally describes this set of vocabulary.

Further thought, if the above language is too neutral, given the group's
predilection for denigrating the retained vocabulary:

   Legacy vocabulary supported for input

That makes its purpose for backward compatibility explicit.


Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking

More information about the rfc-interest mailing list