[rfc-i] extension for xml2rfc files?
nico at cryptonector.com
Tue May 6 17:03:01 PDT 2014
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> [...]. IMO this is inappropriate - the extension ought to be more specific to the
> expected format of the document. [...]
.xml _is_ specific to the format of the document: XML. You meant
schema, I know :) but still: the schema/DTD is declared in the XML,
therefore it can be "tasted", so why pollute the file extension
namespace? I've never felt a need for this.
More information about the rfc-interest