[rfc-i] extension for xml2rfc files?

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Tue May 6 17:03:01 PDT 2014

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> [...].  IMO this is inappropriate - the extension ought to be more specific to the
> expected format of the document.  [...]

.xml _is_ specific to the format of the document: XML.  You meant
schema, I know :) but still: the schema/DTD is declared in the XML,
therefore it can be "tasted", so why pollute the file extension
namespace?  I've never felt a need for this.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list