[rfc-i] DOIs, ISSN identifier and xml2rfc v3 vocabulary
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu May 1 23:22:01 PDT 2014
On 2014-05-02 01:54, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>>> We should probably also make an (auto-generated?) attribute to hold the
>>> ISSN identifier as this should appear in the canonical form.
>> The ISSN identifier is a constant, no?
> Currently it is, though that is not necessarily cast in concrete. What
> is important is that the canonical form has the relevant ISSN identifier
> in it and it is clear that it *is* the ISSN identifier to a (human)
Why does the identifier need to be in it (as long as it *is** a constant)?
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest