[rfc-i] DOIs, ISSN identifier and xml2rfc v3 vocabulary
tony at att.com
Thu May 1 18:02:44 PDT 2014
On 5/1/14, 7:54 PM, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 21:52 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2014-05-01 15:30, Elwyn Davies wrote:
>>> We should probably also make an (auto-generated?) attribute to hold the
>>> ISSN identifier as this should appear in the canonical form.
>> The ISSN identifier is a constant, no?
> Currently it is, though that is not necessarily cast in concrete. What
> is important is that the canonical form has the relevant ISSN identifier
> in it and it is clear that it *is* the ISSN identifier to a (human)
Is the ISSN required to be embedded in the canonical form of the RFC? Or
can it be located solely on the meta-information page for the RFC?
More information about the rfc-interest