[rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"
nico at cryptonector.com
Wed Mar 12 11:03:23 PDT 2014
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-03-12 18:12, Nico Williams wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>
>>> On 2014-03-12 17:58, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>> So, either fix 3.2 to say "one blank space", or modify Section 1 to say
>>>> that CMOS isn't always followed when because.
>>> And furthermore, that would be a rule just for plain text output. Right?
>> A resolution that may make the fewest people unhappy might be to say
>> "two spaces" for the plain text rendering, and "a single wide or
>> proportional space" in renderings that either use a larger repertoire
>> of Unicode codepoints proportional-width fonts, respectively.
> Remember that the tool needs to apply heuristics to detect where a sentence
> ends. I'd rather get rid of this; if nobody except us is doing it, maybe
> it's not needed?
Oh, right. Sorry. _I_ will use two spaces in my sources then (well,
I already do). The RFC-Editor can remove them later, and/or xml2rfc
can add heuristics to coalesce them into one as needed.
More information about the rfc-interest