[rfc-i] [xml2rfc] XML2RFC ticket #227 - failure for reference missing anchor attribute
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Thu Mar 6 05:41:10 PST 2014
On 2014-03-06 08:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-03-06 00:03, Jim Schaad wrote:
>> Unless I hear any objections, the anchor is going to become a required
>> attribute in the dtd at the end of the week.
> I agree that the processor should behave this way, and if changing the
> DTD is how you get there: +1.
> That being said: are we also ok with making this change in the v2 spec?
> I personally think it's a good idea.
> Best regards, Julian
Done in <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/changeset/1240>.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest