[rfc-i] XML2RFC ticket #227 - failure for reference missing anchor attribute
Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
rse at rfc-editor.org
Thu Mar 6 00:30:23 PST 2014
On 3/6/14 7:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-03-06 00:03, Jim Schaad wrote:
>> Unless I hear any objections, the anchor is going to become a required
>> attribute in the dtd at the end of the week.
> I agree that the processor should behave this way, and if changing the
> DTD is how you get there: +1.
> That being said: are we also ok with making this change in the v2 spec?
> I personally think it's a good idea.
You hold the pen on the v2 vocab draft, Jim holds the pen on the code
fix, and I am not seeing objection to doing this. I recommend going ahead.
More information about the rfc-interest