[rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs"
ietf at augustcellars.com
Wed Mar 5 07:49:34 PST 2014
Yes, but that means that the DOI from an old document would hit the "wrong" landing page.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 7:49 AM
> To: Jim Schaad
> Cc: rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital
> Object Identifiers to RFCs"
> On 06/03/2014 03:55, Jim Schaad wrote:
> > I have a nagging in the back of my head. Does a single DOI work for
> > BCPs as the contents of the BCP changes over time?
> I'm not sure which landing page would be used for the DOI, but
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/bcp/bcp10.txt (the plain text landing
> page) is presumably kept current by the RFC Editor.
> > Jim
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-editor.org
> > [mailto:rfc-interest-bounces at rfc-
> >> editor.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 6:28 AM
> >> To: rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> >> Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt,
> >> "Assigning
> > Digital
> >> Object Identifiers to RFCs"
> >> No brainer. Just do it. I'm not sure that it needs to be an RFC
> >> rather
> > than a
> >> page somewhere on the RFC Editor web site.
> >> Brian
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rfc-interest mailing list
> >> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
More information about the rfc-interest