[rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"
Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 06:48:23 PST 2014
I'm happy with the draft except for one subsection.
> 220.127.116.11. Referencing Internet-Drafts
I want to strongly support the proposed inclusion of
the Internet-Draft file name.
The citations committee a few years ago (see
draft-carpenter-rfc-citation-recs-01) actually made four
> 1. The RFC Editor should include the exact publication date in the
> citation of an Internet-Draft.
Including the file name makes this less important.
> 2. Authors should be allowed to cite several versions of the same
This is a corner case but occasionally it's necessary. Can it be mentioned
in the style guide?
> 3. The RFC Editor is encouraged include the full Internet-Draft file
> name in citations.
> 4. A citation of an Internet-Draft should use the phrase "Working
> Draft" rather than "Work in Progress" whenever appropriate.
> (Stream-specific policies and practices might prohibit this
> practice within certain RFC document streams.)
The argument for this is that drafts that expired years ago are
sometimes cited, and calling them "Work in Progress" is simply
More information about the rfc-interest