[rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"

George, Wes wesley.george at twcable.com
Tue Mar 4 10:00:23 PST 2014


From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun at gmail.com<mailto:abdussalambaryun at gmail.com>>

The most important comment for me as start message is that the 1st April RFC should be categorised different than IETF standards. IMHO, The past RFC style is not a reasonable style of the world or the future best practices. In considering our standards business and our documents reputation, we should not make jokes with our followers only if we are sure all like such jokes.

I don't want to stop that Style type, but it should be easily discriminated by readers/users from other real work/business.

WG] Please explain how the combination of the publish date, the doc status (usually info or experimental) plus this boilerplate (below) isn’t enough to distinguish this from standards?

"Status of This Memo


   This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is
   published for informational purposes.

   This is a contribution to the RFC Series, independently of any other
   RFC stream.  The RFC Editor has chosen to publish this document at
   its discretion and makes no statement about its value for
   implementation or deployment.  Documents approved for publication by
   the RFC Editor are not a candidate for any level of Internet
   Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5741#section-2>."


I’d tell you a UDP joke, but you probably won’t get it…

Wes George

Anything below this line has been added by my company’s mail server, I have no control over it.
-----------

________________________________
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20140304/53ef6990/attachment.htm>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list