[rfc-i] use cases for page breaking hints, Re: Update on the plain text thread(s)

Dearlove, Christopher (UK) chris.dearlove at baesystems.com
Mon Jun 30 01:56:50 PDT 2014


Now that's just an attempt to discredit when arguments have failed. You know very well that the use of he and his for all people is of long standing and widely used. Yes, there are arguments against it, and if this were an RFC we could have a legitimate debate. But to make this your point of objection to a piece of informal writing is not worthy of being posted here.

-- 
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Information Assurance Group
Communications, Networks and Image Analysis Capability
BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
Tel: +44 1245 242194 |  Fax: +44 1245 242124
chris.dearlove at baesystems.com | http://www.baesystems.com

BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87, Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687


-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Lemon [mailto:mellon at fugue.com] 
Sent: 27 June 2014 17:22
To: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
Cc: Riccardo Bernardini; Julian Reschke; rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org; Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] use cases for page breaking hints, Re: Update on the plain text thread(s)

----------------------! WARNING ! ---------------------- This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or from the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply.
Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.
--------------------------------------------------------

On Jun 27, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <Chris.Dearlove at baesystems.com> wrote:
> Do we prohibit someone from doing something that makes his document 
> better,

AFAICT, many IETF participants are women.


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list