[rfc-i] diagram issues

George, Wes wesley.george at twcable.com
Wed Jun 25 13:15:33 PDT 2014


On 6/25/14, 3:49 PM, "Joe Touch" <touch at isi.edu> wrote:

>On 6/25/2014 11:56 AM, George, Wes wrote:
>> I believe that the burden of proof here isn't "why ASCII isn't
>> enough" but rather "why we should still be limited to ASCII in 2014".
>
>s/ASCII art/XML-based editors/
>
>My personal preference would be to directly support modern, common
>publishing formats (PDF, DOC), but we've been around that block and
>ended up back at XML anyway.

Yes. Or even using XML, but using docbook or similar instead of inventing
our own standard that has no authoring tools except the ones we build
ourselves.

Wes George


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list