[rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt
elwynd at folly.org.uk
Tue Jun 24 08:55:44 PDT 2014
On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 16:48 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 16:35, Joe Touch wrote:
> > On 6/24/2014 4:04 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
> >> This does appear to convert plain text from normative to close to
> >> useless.
> > +1
> > I'm particularly concerned about the notion that figures that aren't
> > available as ASCII-art will be resolved using URLs.
> Do you have a better suggestion?
Not directly, but it occurs to me that if figures are to be kept
separately, there had better be some way of referencing them through the
proposed DOI scheme. Currently this only deals with the base documents.
More information about the rfc-interest