[rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt

Thomas Clausen ietf at thomasclausen.org
Tue Jun 24 07:59:32 PDT 2014


On Jun 24, 2014, at 16:55, Joe Touch <touch at isi.edu> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 6/24/2014 7:48 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2014-06-24 16:35, Joe Touch wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 6/24/2014 4:04 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
>>>> This does appear to convert plain text from normative to close to
>>>> useless.
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> I'm particularly concerned about the notion that figures that aren't
>>> available as ASCII-art will be resolved using URLs.
>> 
>> Do you have a better suggestion?
> 
> Either provide an ASCII-art version of the figure or *require* that the descriptive text is normative and that the figure is supplemental only.

Very much agree!

> Otherwise you've thrown out text as a viable stand-alone output format - which is too large a leap from the current state.

Very much agree, too.

Thomas

> Joe
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest



More information about the rfc-interest mailing list