[rfc-i] New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt
ietf at thomasclausen.org
Tue Jun 24 06:49:09 PDT 2014
On Jun 24, 2014, at 15:39, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 15:34, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
>> " If you're really interested you may want to look at PrinceXML which"
>> Is exactly the wrong mindset. We want someone who has heard about X, puts X into Google, and finds an RFC. (We'll assume it's a well-written RFC that is what he wants.) Unfortunately that search may not get the ideal, the tools page. But let's assume he's lucky and does.
> OK, that sounds to me like you're not *that* interested.
I think that that’s a *very* strong and *very* wrong conclusion to make, Julian. A fallacy, even.
As protocol engineers, we’re *that* interested in having tools that do not get in the way of designing, reviewing, and implementing protocols.
But we do not care about PrinceXML and the sort. At least, I don’t. Assuming that those who do not enthusiastically “…may want to look at PrinceXML which…” are “not *that* interested” is actually a little insulting.
>> Maybe HTML is what he wants to read online. There's a link for that. Maybe he wants to print it. He knows that his browser is flaky on printing (*) - but there's a PDF link, that will do. He looks at the text version, but it isn't really offering him anything. Though when reading online it and PDF are similar. (I actually usually read text rather than HTML or PDF online, but that's due to familiarity.)
>> What he certainly isn't going to do is look at PrinceXML or anything else.
>> (*) [Off topic.] You say " It may be true that print support isn't a priority anymore for browser developers". Was it ever?
> Right now the RFC Editor only provides plain text. Show me how to print that properly, without additional tools.
> tools.ietf.org currently offers additional formats (for people lucky enough to arrive there). I'm pretty sure this will continue to be the case, except that it won't be the paginated-plain-text-converted-to-HTML-or-PDF anymore. But yes, it will print.
> Best regards, Julian
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest at rfc-editor.org
More information about the rfc-interest