[rfc-i] plain text and non-ASCII, was: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-flanagan-plaintext-00.txt
julian.reschke at gmx.de
Mon Jun 23 11:25:45 PDT 2014
On 2014-06-23 18:28, John C Klensin wrote:
> (4) The many reasons why "text is required to be in UTF-8"
> cannot, by itself, be an appropriate substitute for "text is
> required to be in ASCII" have been extensively discussed
> elsewhere and I will not try to repeat or summarize them here.
> But this draft appears, at least in the absence of normative
> references to other specifications, to make just that
That's discussed in
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-flanagan-nonascii-01> -- it applies to
all formats, not only the plaintext format.
Best regards, Julian
More information about the rfc-interest