[rfc-i] Summary: use case for 2119 markup
tony at att.com
Fri Jun 20 15:07:25 PDT 2014
On 6/20/14, 1:32 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote:
> Anything missing?
Another nuance that could be considered is the use of such markup ONLY
for Internet Drafts, and NOT for publishing.
This would have the affect of providing such optional markup for use by
authors that choose to use it, but not have the secondary affect that
some people have been concerned about with such use in the RFCs themselves.
More information about the rfc-interest