[rfc-i] Summary: use case for 2119 markup

Dave Crocker dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Jun 20 10:40:37 PDT 2014


On 6/20/2014 10:37 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>  1.  this is actually a process change, and hence should go through the
>     IETF consensus process
>  2.  what it would mean to use this markup is not at all clear


+1

This isn't merely a matter of editorial nuance and I strongly suspect
its effects are not all that well understood.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list