[rfc-i] Is there a use case for 2119 keyword markup?

Nico Williams nico at cryptonector.com
Fri Jun 20 00:11:30 PDT 2014


On Thursday, June 19, 2014, Ted Lemon <mellon at fugue.com> wrote:

> On Jun 20, 2014, at 12:00 AM, Nico Williams <nico at cryptonector.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Please read all of what I wrote.  It wasn't much.
>
> I did read what you wrote.   I can't understand how any long-time IETF
> participant could say such a thing with a straight face, hence the comment.
>   Anyway, I expounded on the same issue later, so no point reiterating.
>

So you don't think I should ever have written "this section is
INFORMATIVE", nor that <section> could have an attribute to indicate the
same?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/attachments/20140620/9ac3d14f/attachment.html>


More information about the rfc-interest mailing list